MTL - Returning to ’90s, She Became Famous in Major Surgical Fields

   Chapter 3819 [3819] Intrigue

  Jiang Mingzhu and Yu Xuexian who left are discussing this matter. Jiang Mingzhu agrees with Teacher Lu, who thinks that the junior sister is likely to be discriminated against by a foreign reviewer.

  The reason why she asked immediately when they met was also because He Xiangyu had announced that it would be passed soon, but the result was so late that people were puzzled.

  Jiang Mingzhu argued: "She should go to the editor-in-chief to give her opinion, complaining that the reviewers have problems."

  Internationally renowned journals have a reputation, and the editor-in-chief is a relatively fair academic.

  Yu Xuexian lifted his glasses with his fingers, looking much calmer than his younger wife.

  Things are not so simple. If a complaint can solve the problem, why should Director Fang emphasize the need to build a good domestic platform.

  What is academic publication called?

   Grab intellectual patent rights.

  Think about it, if the research topic of your published article happens to have similarities or similarities with others, this person happens to be the reviewer. You said that when the reviewer saw that his research results had not yet been published, you got it first, and his mentality must not collapse. Can you pass the test smoothly?

  Student Xie’s thesis questions mainly focused on domestic problems without any big questions. Don't say here that everyone in the country has to look at the face of Mr. Cao Yudong. This is impossible. Cao Yudong has his own competitors. Don't blame Mr. Lu for suspecting that some people in foreign countries wear colored glasses with ulterior motives.

  There are more international academic competition for talents, which is undoubtedly far more ruthless than that of a single country.

   Don't say stupid things about scholars without borders, that's to fool young people who don't understand society. There are some calculating people in the world who wish to use this kind of gibberish to let some stupid scholars who dream of academic purity share the results.

  If you can’t do your own research, you can learn from other people’s shared results.

  It can be said that the world of scholars with high IQs is never pure and noble, on the contrary, the mystery of "killing" is hidden in it. Those who want money in academia cannot develop without money, so they must be linked to commercial interests. Business wars are like battlefields, how could academia not be a battlefield?

   It can be seen that once you encounter this kind of problem during the submission process, the situation will be far more complicated than you imagined.

  As long as there is a conflict of interest, it is impossible for peer reviewers not to get you in the dark. How to mess with you, people with high IQs are much more insidious. For reference, Zhou Ruomei is extremely insidious in messing with her relatives, she is just a small shrimp with an IQ.

   One of the most common ways is: dragging you to death.

   Don't reject you directly. Rejecting you directly may allow you to submit to other places. It is best to let you revise frequently once, twice or three times. This is why some manuscripts take an unbelievably long review time.

   Of course, you can never say that all the reviewers who ask you to revise the manuscript are bad reviewers. How to tell whether the reviewer has good intentions or evil intentions.

  Such as the one encountered by Xie.

  The good news leaked by Dr. Li Xiaoshen is not wrong. In the first three reviews on the international platform, she quickly passed the domestic review, which is enough to speculate that her manuscript can be published soon. In the end, she was stuck in the hands of the fourth reviewer.

  The fourth reviewer has been catching grammatical errors in her paper.

   Once again, Director Fang's words are confirmed. A strong domestic platform can occupy another necessary advantage: the language system.

  Academic barriers of different language systems Academic traps are also unimaginable for laymen.

  If the reviewer really catches her wrong language, forget it, no, it is to make her change the key academic information of the paper and the logical structure of her paper by picking on the language.

  (end of this chapter)